Where Are The Gun Nuts?

There are two rules to remember when talking to Texans: don’t mention Custer, and don’t question the right to bear arms. I learned these rules the hard way while working with a bunch of Texans at Hush, when I raised the innocent question: “So, why exactly, do you need guns?”

Big mistake.

When I regained consciousness, I learned that the Texans consider guns an essential part of being a citizen. Only by possessing a gun could a citizen adequately equip himself to repel an invasive or repressive entity. Given America’s history of repelling outside forces, including its own colonial government, this seemed like a well-considered line of reasoning for keeping a gun. Then again, it’s important to recognize that this well-considered line of reasoning was well-considered and reasoned in the late 18th century, an age before you could buy semi-automatic weaponry at the local Wal-Mart.

Fast forward to present day.

In his recent book, Michael Moore wrote a satirical letter to the UN claiming the rightful US government had been overthrown by a junta led by George W. Bush in a mock appeal for immediate intervention by the United Nations. In seriousness, his claim is not without merit. However, if we are to take Moore’s claim seriously for a moment, we have to ask ourselves an important question: where are the gun nuts?

Sorry. Of course, I meant to say “gun enthusiasts”. “Patriots”. “Freedom Fighters”. “‘Soldier of Fortune’ subscribers”. Whatever. You know who I’m talking about. Or rather, who I’m talking to.

That’s right, I’m talking to you, Mr. “loaded-gun-under-the-pillow”. The day is at hand that you’ve feared all along! The US is in the grips of corporate raiders, bent on exploiting Lady Liberty for their own gain. Your own government is a tool of oppression, and now is the time to rise up and overthrow your government!

Oh wait, that’s right. You’ve only got an assortment of small arms, whereas your government has access to nifty gadgets like multi-billion dollar, state-of-the-art fighter planes equipped with air-to-ground missiles. Oh well, no one said the fight would be easy. Good luck! This web page will self destruct in five seconds!

Mental Spasmastics

In this week’s episode: the slow, ponderous march to war continues. At the risk of inducing the mental equivalent of a charlie horse, I’ve continued to try to follow the United States’ logic in its argument for attacking Iraq. Let me get this straight: the US is pushing for the UN to punish Iraq for breaching an earlier UN resolution and if the UN doesn’t comply the US will…breach a UN resolution?!? Ow, ow, ow! Can anyone say “doublethink“?

Meanwhile, the United States continues to act like a spoiled frat jock, delivering political wedgies and noogies for all who oppose them. Consider this little gem:

“Going to war without France is like going deer hunting without an accordion. All you do is leave behind a lot of noisy baggage.”

Who said it? If you said “Donald Rumsfeld, US Secretary of Defense”, you win the grand prize: unilateral US military action!

Don’t get me wrong, Saddam’s a bad guy. But there are a lot of bad guys in the world and the US doesn’t seem to normally have any problem trading with any of them on a regular basis. Heck, they’ve even armed and trained them on occasion. And only now the US chooses to play John Wayne and clean up the Wild West? Oh, that’s right. Now there’s more money in ousting them than arming them.

The problem is the US doesn’t recognize the hypocrisy it displays in promoting its own brand of democracy: freedom, liberty and democracy for all, just as long as you agree with us and let us do whatever the hell we want. As Bill Maher pointed out in his recent book, “When You Ride Alone, You Ride With Bin Laden“, the reason the outside world hates the US is because it is so painfully clueless about why the outside world should even have reason to hate the US.

Politicians such as Rumsfeld are supposed to not only possess the ability to adeptly build consensus but also the intelligence to use that ability. Incendiary comments such as those of Rumsfeld only reinforce the stereotype of the US as a spoiled, self-absorbed child that takes its ball home when people don’t play by its rules. And then it wonders why people want to do crazy things like, say, fly planes into buildings.