Atomic Shredder

I’ve been trying to think a lot about the Next Big Thing, the kind of technology that will usher in widespread change making lives better around the world. Yeah, I don’t like to think small. The technology that most people think will change the world, nanotechnology, is probably decades away; however, I’d like to propose a more important milestone we should strive for before we attempt to build physical products on an atomic scale.

In his classic lecture of December 1959, titled “There’s Plenty Of Room At The Bottom”, Richard Feynman proposed creating smaller manipulators which in turn would be used to build even smaller manipulators, eventually enabling atomic-scale manipulation . It’s a neat idea, but one that has yet to come to fruition. What I wonder is if what we really need is the capability to assemble on an atomic scale; it would seem a more practical goal to be able to disassemble materials, if not on an atomic scale, then at least a near-atomic scale.

In the case of nanotechnology, I wonder how we will be able to assemble solid materials at an atomic scale without having repulsive forces blow apart a work in progress before reaching a stable crystalline state. Historically, it’s always been easier to destroy that to create, so why not use that to our advantage? Given humanity’s appetite for throwing tons of away perfectly good resources into landfills every day, a far more useful technology would be some kind of atomic shredder. Such a device would be capable of breaking down large items, such as consumer electronics, into piles of relatively homogeneous and pure raw materials. Given the failure of recycling to reclaim significant amounts of resources due to the difficulty of easily separating constituent components, this would be a perfect solution.

If only we had such a technology we would be in the midst of a new resource Gold Rush, except this time the prospectors wouldn’t be looking for gold. They’d be looking for garbage.

Ringtone Hell

If there’s a God in Heaven, let him be so kind as to inspire someone to come up with a replacement for the piezoelectric speaker. These speakers, based on the piezoelectric effect, are the workhorses of many applications, providing a small and energy efficient method of providing audio in a variety of applications. And none so annoying as the dreaded cellphone ring tone.

It amazes me that people can spend so much time meticulously choosing a theme song or jingle to serve as the ring tone that captures their “personality”. And then passes that personality through the audio blender that is eight-bit sound and a piezoelectric speaker. Ouch.

The influence of the piezoelectric speaker and low-quality sound output are probably more pervasive than we might recognize. After all, how many of us had a Speak & Spell? That joyful orange box of electronics that taught us the joy of spelling. In a monotonous, Ben-Stein-meets-Stephen-Hawking, lo-res version of a real human voice. It’s a wonder any of us are comprehensible in everyday conversation.

Today, every toy is now being stuffed with a voice. And they all suck. Sure, the potential benefit of a toy that talks and responds to a kid is immense, but at what cost? Are we going to end up with a generation of children who speak with built-in distortion and the verbal gait of a Canadian Prime Minister?